Islam

Arab spring shenanigan

Winning!

Before I start pointing fingers at what is happening now in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia, I would like to remind everyone there’s already an appalling example in the same region: Iraq. Regardless of the strong economic incentives to intervene in Iraq, the biggest legitimate excuse was to liberate the Iraqis free of Saddam’s tyranny. Now people are freed, Saddam was executed, what happened to Iraqis now? (ferocious laughter here) At least we could say the presence of US force merely sustains a paper-thin secular government. Nobody knows how messy it would become after the withdrawal of US troops here in the ancient land of Mesopotamia.

Shifting back to current waves of so-called “Arab Spring”. As far as I could see, it is not about democracy, freedom, or human rights. Instead, it is the sheer consequence of the uncontrolled inbreeding within every Arab clan. Simple, the babies keep popping out in an exponential level, whereas the local economy gets shittier and shittier day by day. Look at the massive percentage of people under 25 in those Arab countries (including Tunisia, albeit having the most rational birth rate), it is no surprise to see that it is just a matter of time when the shit hits the fan. Babies grow up to be agonizing unemployed rabbles, how would they not go on the street and demand changes? Meanwhile, Arabs are far from being enlightened to know what democracy means, and there goes the soft political absorption of public unrest. With average inbred IQ level, lazy economic status, low education level (but Koran education), bursting population, drastic social rioting is then the most likely to erupt at any time.

So when the massive excessive youngsters’ riot finally broke out in the Arab world, it only leaves two scenarios in the society: either the incumbent ruling class miraculously tame the angry youths (this is what Syria, Yemen, Algeria, Bahrain, Saudi, Jordan, and Morocco are trying), or the rabbles grow into a momentum that would rumble the current polity (this is what happens in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya). However, in either scenario the fundamental root of this social unrest would not be addressed and problems would eventually spread to Europe because of its proximity and economic attractiveness to those regions. Of course, the latter option would make the whole process much faster, like it or not. This is what we have witnessed as we speak in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya.

In the meantime, it is infuriating to see how the Western political elites are responding to such change in the region. It is really not difficult to figure out the causes and effects of this massive social upraising in the Arab world, yet decision-makers decided to appease the leftists’ touching lines and follow their guts and hearts in this one, once again. One thing leads to another. The next thing we know Western leaders back-stabbed their traditional dictator allies like Ben-Ali, Mubarak, and even Gaddafi who turned pro-west in the last decade of his regime. In Tunisia and Egypt there are strong local military presence; so Western leaders only turned their ugly faces to the rioters. In Libya, there isn’t even a common ground for a sense of nationhood; so NATO bombed every possible targets, armed and trained the rebels. Anyway, all these actions now seem to serve one mega sacred purpose: to shed the light of western liberalism in the Arab world.

It is indeed a very noble thought, except that reality does not revolve around some noble dreams. When the plans are completely detached to the reality, we call it nothing but a phony sham. The cornerstone that goes against Western egalitarianism in those places is their strong affiliation to Islam, which has its own detailed description of how everything should work out in a Muslim society (without the presence of an iron secular ruling elites). Evidence? Look at the so-called first legitimate democratic election in the Arab world: Tunisian Islamist party claims election victory, set to dominate writing of new constitution. It is widely recognized that Tunisia is the most modernized and secular-minded Arab state in the region, yet this happens. I have predicted such trend long before the election was held, just did not foresee it’d come so easily. Similar flows would be soon expected in Egypt and Libya, with much stronger momentum.

In the end, the demographic bombs are not defused at all. Islamism is on the rise. More excessive young Muslims would flock to Europe and colonize the ageing population there. For all we know, western ideologies are no longer appealing to the Arabs. The age when they rushed to wear suits and speak English has long gone with the wind. Population bomb + revitalization of Islamism, with the catalysis of western leftism, it’s a picture of one million raving fists swinging in the air. Let’s give it 50 years to happen.

Asylum seekers’ riot in Australia

Today in Darwin, Northern Australia, a riot broke up in a detention center and set the whole facility afire. Firefighters went to the location trying to extinguish the fire and were greeted with stones thrown at them. Quite “coincidentally”, this day is also the Muslim holy day Eid al-Fitr which marks the end of the month-long of fasting of Ramadan. Also another one “contingent” fact is that the detention center “happens to” detain lots of third-world inveterate “asylum seekers” from neighboring country Indonesia. Most of the asylum seekers are Indonesian Muslims. Not exactly knowing how paying to be smuggled to Australia on an overloaded raft equals the “asylum seeker” status, they are there in the detention center.

“A source inside the centre said no detainees were allowed to attend Darwin Mosque today to take part in the festivities.”

Blatantly revealing as it is, the officials has to be politically correct to omit certain facts:

“The Federal Immigration Department confirmed there was an incident at the centre but said it was too early to comment”

Of course they don’t want to comment on it. The truth is they accepted a bunch of Muslim mobs in their land, and must have a real headache on how to deal with them without being seen discriminated. Is it incorrect to associate Muslims as loose cannons and mobs potential? Quoted from the Australian Federal Immigration Department: “it was too early to comment“. Islam in Indonesia has undergone a rapid radicalization process in recent years. The old peaceful jungle people are more than ever devoted to the religion of those Arab traders nowadays. The result is all those radical Islam movement you see in the country: banning ancient pagan tradition, bombing Western devils, restricting young people’s public behavior etc. However, the mentality of you-don’t-allow-me-go-to-mosque-I-burn-your-house does perfectly match the IQ and the ideology of its believers and the warrior religion itself.

Australia should send those barbaric mobs to Malaysia as part of the immigrants swap agreement with their government. They must not release them and grant them the Asylum Seeker status. Picture this: a block where Muslim family waving to a gay couple next door while women walking in bikini on the street. The likelihood of that happening is laughably slim as long as Muslims still take Islam as the guideline for everything they do. If the liberals really feel compassionate at the starving third world people, there’s plenty of infidel minorities in those Muslims countries under fierce persecution under Muslim governments.

Unfortunately, The incident comes on the same day the High Court ruled against the Federal Government’s refugee swap deal with Malaysia.” A great victory for leftists and their Muslim brothers.

“The Clone” the telenovela

One classic piece of news brought you by the leftist media: Islam takes root in land of mini-bikinis and Carnival

The title is a total spoiler, but if you dig a bit further into this piece of bizarre news, you will be surprised how distorted the way they broadcast something that could definitely be seen as a concerning (if not alarming enough) trend in Brazil. The whole article basically tells one clear message: Islam is growing fast nowadays among the Brazilians. And AFP is staying “absolutely neutral” in broadcasting this issue, except for quoting some extremely retarded comments from those newly converts. Here is some funny lines in the news article:

“In a land known more for its mini-bikinis and extravagant Carnival featuring scantily clad women, a small but growing number of Brazilians of various backgrounds call themselves Muslim”

This line shows how great the progress of modern society Brazil has achieved. Not only the blacks in the slums (which is totally omitted in this diversity talk), we could have scantily clad women and completely clad women coexisting in the same city!

“At the seminary, you learn that Islam is one of the monotheistic religions. There is no prejudice against this religion”

So the locals learned Islam from the seminary, and it’s “one” of “the monotheistic religions”. How humble the way he put it! There’s no prejudice at all except there’s no god but Allah and the rest are infidels and all should “revert”(a term specially favored by the Muslims, which I found very amusing) to the truth of Islam one way or another (revert, extra tax, or death). People tend to forget Muslims still live in the medieval age. I don’t see the major difference of a small but “viable” Muslim community to the predominant Muslim country like Pakistan, Iran, or Egypt. As long as they still believe that Sharia system, there’s nothing but prejudice.

“Brazil is a mix, made up of several different cultures. This mix makes Brazilians very adaptable and tolerant.”

Exactly what culture Brazil is mixing with? Amerindians? Boy they’d be happy to hear that if they didn’t get obliterated by the outsiders. Africans? Only if you count drumming and naked dancing into your culture… Even if Brazil is mixing with “different cultures”, how does that make people adaptable and tolerant to Islam? Only leftism could shamelessly admit that to Islam. One Muslim could be friendly, but I don’t think one Muslim street or even a block would have the same attitude towards your daughter’s hot bikini and booty shaking addiction.

“In the beginning, my mother was mortified at the thought of going outside with me. I wear the veil to show I am Muslim and aware that I am part of a minority”

Congrats! Now you are officially a minority, aka the superior group in the modern society. Leftists worship you, media bow to you, we fear you. Nothing better than being a minority in the modern society, provided that you are not a Christian in Pakistan or a Zoroastrian in Iran, or a Copt in Egypt. In the future there should be a float exclusively for the veiled women in the Rio Carnival. After all, nothing better than minorities exerting their super-citizenship.

“After the September 11 attacks in the United States, “there was a growth of interest in Islam, and many people decided to convert,” Pinto added. “Islam was seen as a new form of resistance.” But it was a “telenovela” or soap opera launched just three weeks after the 2001 attacks, “The Clone,” that sparked some Brazilians’ infatuation with Islam. Set in Morocco, the popular show showed a “positive imagine of that part of the world, with a benevolent Muslim hero,” said Pinto.”

This is the best part of the article. It made me laugh very hard for literally 30 seconds. Have to give credits to the person who said such things. So that’s what the Brazilian “reverted” Muslims think: Sept.11 serves as an opportunity for them to appreciate Islam, for the first time they saw someone is hard enough to whip American’s ass? What a great logic to embrace Islam. To make it even better, here comes the telenovela “THE CLONE” (supported by the leftist media of course, they love showing multiculturalism on TV) that push this article to a higher entertaining level. Sure let’s pretend there is A benevolent Muslim here, it’s just I don’t think I am classified as the type of people that hero could be benevolent to. So essentially people are driven to embrace Allah and veil themselves because of a cliche TV show praising Muslims created by leftist liberal believers.

“There is a tendency to think that Brazilian culture, as liberal and sensual as it is, is against the rules of Islam. But in fact, there are many conservative rules that are part of moral and sexual control. Look at how many evangelicals are successful in Brazil!”

I know media doesn’t want to be labelled as “politically incorrect” these days; but the spread of Islam is DEFINITELY not kind of the positive progress for the social improvement. People have every reason to get worried instead of cheering for the great diversity the modern society has created here. What I see the trend described here is probably more like a bunch of lower social class, probably mostly blacks and mulatto in the slum (the race and social class of those local converts is totally omitted here), turned to the preaching of Saudi oil money, encouraged by the liberals, and incidentally embracing the religion of Arabian desert tribes. To them it’s probably just another way to express their anger over the Brazilian society where their status are highly marginalized, like the Nation of Islam in the US, or the case in India.

I really don’t see the fact that Islam is spreading fast in Christian states (or China in my case) could be ever counted as a positive sign for the prosperity of the country. All failed cases in the Western Europe should give those ebullient Brazilians some good lessons, if they’d listen. Longing for diversity and universal equality is biggest flaw of modern leftism. A hardcore liberal might send his/her kids to the public school full of bullying immigrants from the third world, but his/her neighbor Mohammed would absolutely not be okay with your daughter’s blasphemous bikinis and the sordid carnival.

I do believe that people are genuinely stupid in making our own decisions. It’s way more effective to convince others with touching emotions and inflammable passion about absolute non-sense than reasoning logic and cold facts about the truth that everyone hates to confront. Good luck to those Brazilian Muslims, as they most likely would have.

Edit: This post serves as my personal emotional outcry against the Islam. My biggest cognitive bias and so far I just couldn’t find a better reason not to bash it whenever I can… 

The famous "Clone" show poster

Updates for the ritual slaughter ban in Holland

In my previous block I have acclaimed the Dutch move of ritual slaughter ban targeting halal and kosher slaughtering as a brilliant move to use the dismay of one leftist group (animal rights group) as an excuse, or at least the most visible rationale to tame the growing trouble-making Islamic influence in the Netherlands.

I found this quite interesting and funny, especially the fact that Dutch legislation picks up animal rights, a common leftist ideology associated with affluence and excessive feminine sympathy , as a new sharp sword and shell to confront the most controversial social issue in Europe (that is… grrr. Immigration, Islam etc.). Though the Dutch move is not as sophisticated and convincing as it seems, it still counts as a big leap forward from simply denying the existence of those problems with wishful thinking of a peaceful neighborhood where gay couples neighbor a Wahhabi clan and say hi to each other with smile.

Gotta give credit to this action for that. However, there’s the follow-up of this ban which I found even more entertaining and amusing than the original story: the annoyance of the Jew in the Netherlands

What’s with the Jews? Well, the modern Europe is simply too intimidating to do anything that looks even slightly anti-Jewish (I avoid the term antisemitism, as their Muslims counterparts are the same breed – Semites, except for the Turks and Hausa). And there is really no reason to disdain the Jews in Holland anyway. Sure they may not believe in Jesus Christ and pretty much dominated the capitalistic financial world and help created ideology monsters like Communism and leftism, but they coexist pretty nicely with the other people nowadays and have produced loads of smart fellas that propel the voyage of modern human civilization. Looks like Jews are clean from European’s bash on Muslims, but why are they bitching about ritual slaughter ban?

Well, to answer this question, it is important to clarify that some Jews (though most of Jews in Europe and America got emancipated from strict religious belief) are still practicing their ancient rituals, which pretty much share a lot in common with their Muslim/Arab relatives. For example, Jews don’t eat pork, just like the Muslims. In this case Jews also perform a ancient ritual slaughtering called Kosher that is almost like the Jewish version of Halal in Islam, or the other way around (whatever makes you feel better). Evidently when the pretentious Dutch politicians were desperately looking for a way to curb the Muslims implosion in the country while still claiming to be much of a believer in universal equality and freedom that would attract enough votes to be popular, they could not single out the Muslims and deal with the issues publicly (though I think it would be much more effective to deal with the situation alone) due to their paradoxical “political morals”. Thus they have to bring down the whole clumps of “ritual slaughter” into the muddy water; and that act unfortunately also targets Kosher slaughtering as inhumane and banned as a result. This is basically how the Jews get spotted into the collateral damage (like the French ban on religious symbols at school, you think the French don’t like the cross-necklace wearing Catholic or Jews with Star of David?). So at the end of day, in this story, Jews get served, Kosher slaughter banned. Even though it is so obvious that Jews are not the target and Kosher is not Halal,their interests have to be sacrificed for the sake of aiming at Muslims. Even though Rabbis openly protest for the innocence of Kosher slaughtering, clarifying them not being the target but the Muslims (and they are absolutely correct), the hypocrisy of European politics matches on. Pity the Jews, just inconvenient timing when leftism deters any effective actions without hypocrisy and contingent  collateral damages. To me, it is such a relish to look at the contrasting stances and arguments of different claimants in this case.

When left attacks “minorities”

This morning I have briefly went through this piece of news, which caught my great attention.

Dutch MPs vote to ban religious slaughter

Basically the Netherlands is following the steps of New Zealand, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland to become the latest country to ban halal or kosher animal slaughter in their own country. I always view religion as a guideline of personal philosophy and worldview (albeit being a stupid one), and anything else that does not have to do with this should not be labeled as religion in a free country (e.g. islamic finance, sharia law, and halal/kosher slaughter). I am glad to see the Netherlands is starting to deal with its issues with the Muslim immigration population in its country, this is so much better than left UK appeasement to Islam, which is going to bring down UK to a total sectarian clash forefront eventually (what a pity).

Either way, the most funny part is that the the animal right group is one of the most visible groups that are lobbying for the ban of halal/kosher slaughter. This is such a great combination to push such moves as a group of leftist animal rights group, which is considered as sort of able-to-come-common-ground thoughts in Europe, go against the so-called religious minority, as named by other groups of leftists. It is so obvious that to publicly denounce a religion practice or immigration is mostly likely to be labeled with racism and hatred  and get ridiculed in the mass media. As much as it is the right the move to deal with the practical issues, you need sophisticated public speaking skills to awaken the mass to stop denying the fact that those problems don’t exist and there’s nothing serious out of it. If you are too outspoken, look at that Geert Wilder. Basically if the visible voice beyond this ban is from realists like Wilder or Le Pan, the media tone would be much more different, I am sure there is going to be massive condemnation from the mass media, which is basically controlled by the leftist liberal who thinks all people think alike and should be treated alike. But if it is the animal rights group who accused the religious slaughtering inhumane to the animals, looks like people tend to stand along with the animal rights with a little bit of hidden annoyance against Muslims in their mind. Though animal rights are not something that I find appealing or worth paying attention to, I am more happy to see some restraint of the Islamic gloom in Europe.