More poor and stupid

Yes, that’s right. I am sure you have read the news: the world population is going to reach 7 billion this month.

 

A round of applause everyone! Our messed up mortal realm just couldn’t keep getting any worse than continuously absorbing more in-bred, low IQ, and mostly impoverished  babies in an accelerating manner. Why do I say so? Because most of the new babies are born in places where those three criteria greatly intertwine with each other? Without the generous humanitarianism from the western leftists, the populations in those regions would never break the Malthusian line. I, for one always think every people and every country deserve the things that they belong to. For example, the consequence of giving endless oil money to the Arabs was one of those major blames for the nuclear explosion-alike population burst in the Middle East. Look at what a skyrocketing population full of excessive babies have done to that region at the moment.

In most of the regions which result in the rapid world population growth, the local society simply could not handle the unprecedented population explosion. The polity, the social structure, the mind-set, even the IQ are not even remotely ready for such drastic change yet. With the western intervention, mother nature is no longer a determinant in restraining these local populations. Two things will and are already happening: 1. even larger waves of illegal immigration from the third world to the West, and 2. more social chaos that would not only severely affect those third world societies but also ones in the West. Remember the change of French history textbook?

Rational leftists might blame me for being ignoring the importance of those young population in world’s economy (endless cheap labor) and even offsetting the ageing issues of developed countries. Here is what I would say: remember 200 years ago when we started to use machines instead of intensive labors in the factory? Cheap labor would only function this far. Besides, we will never run out of cheap labor. The point is they would be even less cheap labor jobs for those newly born ones in the slums and townships in the future. I wouldn’t call that a benefit at all. Absorbing those young population in the developed countries? That’s a total fallacy. Not to even mention the level of adverse cultural and social impact of their arrival would impose on the local advanced but deteriorating civilizations, I just stress on one point: productivity. The productivity of 100 new-born inbred babies from the slum in the future will not be even nearly as high as one kid with high IQ and born in an well-educated family and well-organized society. Remember why Israel a few days ago wanted to swap 1000 Arab prisoners for just one Jew kid? Simple, one Jewish kid outperforms 1000 Arabs; and that is just one of the million pieces of inconvenient fact hard to sallow for the egalitarians and emotionalists.

Muslims, Blacks, and probably a bit Indians … They will make the biggest part of the new generation, in their own homeland and yours in the future. statistically speaking this is a very disheartening trend. Doubling from the lower and lower birth rate from the smart and well-educated population, there will relatively even more poor and stupid in the future. When we have the whole assembly line controlled by only two Master Degree kids and thousand robotics and computers, we surely need lots of them.

IQ by Country

This reminds me of public’s attitude towards climate change: there’s mitigation measures and adaptation measures. When there’s really no promising adaptation measures, nobody takes a serious look into the mitigation idea. Cold truth as it is, we have to face it some way or another.

16 comments

  1. Of course, wealthy nations could just kick the illegals out. And they will. I have little doubt that any wealthy country could keep the illegals to a minimum of they stopped pussyfooting around and get serious about it, but that’s not the end of it. We can’t ignore the great unwashed, one way or another they WILL affect us, whether we keep them out or not.

    So… what can we do?

  2. Your IQ by country map is racist!!! For all you know, they could be geniuses given enough education and raise the GDP of their impoverished countries above developed countries! /sarc

  3. the problem is not illegals. Its 3rd worlders in general. France has millions of legal africans. Most of them nationals even. They have to be kicked out. To the last one.

  4. @iws: let’s hope for the best, and i think it’s the reason that no one likes reality

    @RVT: Yes, one way or another, it’s inevitable. I vision an outbreak of massive conflict in the west, for all I know the West wouldn’t be subdued to those waves of demographic shifts either, albeit the prominence of leftism. At least I hope so.

    @Dali: totally right. there’s gotta be some geniuses, somewhere, somehow.. lol

    @spandrell: Don’t be racisssst, they idolize the blacks, look at their new textbooks.. haha

  5. Dont be ridiculous: they exchanged the jew for 1000 arabs not because he has “more utility” but for other reasons: to keep the morals high.Every little nerdy jew must know that there is the army and the government behind…so he will crush arabs with more courage

    1. Is it ridiculous? Morale is def one of the incentives, but it doesn’t rule out the fact that Jews are valued much higher than Arab. One jew is always way more important than the Arabs. That’s a fact. This prisoners swap just proved it once again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s